Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Mark-Flavius Andres Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs M. Andres

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Mark-Flavius Andres

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Andres

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Mark-Flavius Andres winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Mark-Flavius Andres was at the Belgium F14, 12-09-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Andres	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Belgium F14(09-12-16)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Mark-Flavius Andres

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Andres H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Andres
$3,738,275	Career Prize Money	$0
60.83% (382-246)	Career Total W/L	37.98% (49-80)
1	Clay	0
7	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
43.24% (16-21)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Andres Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24% of points on their second serve, while Mark-Flavius Andres has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mark-Flavius Andres has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mark-Flavius Andres has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 47.62% of matches played (W/L 30/33), with Mark-Flavius Andres winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Mark-Flavius Andres has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 36/46), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 23% (W/L 5/17).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Mark-Flavius Andres has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Mark-Flavius Andres being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Mark-Flavius Andres winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Mark-Flavius Andres was at the Belgium F14, 12-09-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 141.05 while Mark-Flavius Andres has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mark-Flavius Andres has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mark-Flavius Andres has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Mark-Flavius Andres Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Andres H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Andres
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
2	Aces (Total)	0
5	Total Double Faults	3
1:9:0	Average Match Time	1:9:0
49% (24/49)	1st Serve %	55% (27/49)
75% (18/24)	1st Serve Win %	37% (10/27)
52% (13/25)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (11/22)
83% (5/6)	Break Pts Won %	50% (1/2)
57% (28/49)	Return Points Win %	37% (18/49)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka	L	2-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Andres Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Egypt F34 (Sharm El Sheikh) - 13-11-2017
Q2 Anton ChekhovA. Chekhov	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Matthew BeecherM. Beecher	W	6-2 7-5	Stats
Egypt F33 (Sharm El Sheikh) - 06-11-2017
Q1 Michal LusovskyM. Lusovsky	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Belgium F11 (Damme) - 28-08-2017
Q2 Nick MichielssenN. Michielssen	L	1-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
Belgium F10 (Lambermont) - 21-08-2017
Q2 Jake HerseyJ. Hersey	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Andres Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Andres
60.83% (382/246)	YTD Win/Loss	37.98% (49/80)
57.84% (874/637)	Sets Win/Loss	40.21% (113/168)
52.97% (7595/6742)	Games Win/Loss	46.11% (1169/1366)
57.81% (74/54)	Hard Win/Loss	22.73% (5/17)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	43.90% (36/46)
64.13% (118/66)	Indoor Hard W/L	32.00% (8/17)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.01
3139	Aces Total	12
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.04
2297	Total Double Faults	49
1:36:56	Average Match Time	1st Match
393.07	Average Opponent Rank	279.62
62% (25788/41885)	1st Serve %	55% (304/552)
72% (18493/25788)	1st Serve Win %	57% (173/304)
48% (7758/16100)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (115/248)
43% (1881/4385)	Break Points Won % (Total)	33% (13/39)
40% (17540/43322)	Return Points Win %	34% (177/523)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
48.21% (27/29)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.30% (79/75)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/1)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	38.28% (49/79)
62% (354/572)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	38% (48/127)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
53% (108/205)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (16/30)
57% (117/206)	Deciding Set Win %	36% (9/25)
89% (359/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (52/42)
11% (359/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (52/9)
23% (267/62)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (77/7)